Leadership Personas

Relationship Reading

Most personality assessments rely on self-reflection and participation. But what if you could analyze a leader’s decision-making style without them taking a test?

Leadership personas are an observational framework that helps employees, change managers and teams quickly identify how their leader thinks, communicates and makes decisions.

At Creative Change, we've identified four leadership personas:

The Dynamo (CEO, Sales, Growth-Oriented Leaders). Fast-moving, high-energy, big-picture thinkers.
The Guardian (CFO, CIO, Risk-Averse Leaders). Cautious, pragmatic and protective of stability.
The Architect (Finance, IT, Operations, Detail-Oriented Leaders). Analytical, systems-driven and methodical.
The Harmonizer (CMO, CHRO, Culture-Driven Leaders). Empathetic, people-focused and collaboration-driven.

Instead of trying to force a one-size-fits-all approach, this method helps you tailor your influence strategy to match their natural preferences.

A few ways to leverage Leadership Personas into Change Management:

Analyze, don’t assume. Instead of guessing, observe how your leader makes decisions, what information they rely on and how they react under pressure.
Tailor your communication. A detail-driven leader needs data and logic, while a big-picture visionary responds to stories and high-level insights.
Match their decision-making speed. Some leaders need time to process and reflect while others expect fast, confident recommendations.
Anticipate objections. By understanding what makes them hesitant, whether it’s risk, uncertainty or control, you can preemptively address their concerns.
Speak their motivation language. Some leaders prioritize efficiency, others value innovation, stability or relationships. Frame your message accordingly.
Know when and how to push back. The right approach depends on the persona. Some leaders respect direct challenges while others need diplomatic persuasion.

Back To List

Know Thy Leader

The Secret to Influencing Decisions

Leadership personas unlock the power of upstream influence.

Case Study

Navigating Leadership Personas in Change Management

Problem

During an ERP system implementation, two executive sponsors had very different leadership personas, which influenced how they approached risk and decision-making:

The Guardian (CFO), was focused on financial control, risk mitigation and enforcing strict processes to ensure budget discipline.
The Harmonizer (Chief People Officer), was focused on employee well-being, minimizing disruption, and ensuring payroll accuracy to protect staff.

Their conflicting priorities created tension:

The CFO wanted to lock down financial approvals, limiting invoice processing to directors and above, which frustrated managers accustomed to delegating this task.
The CPO was highly risk-averse regarding payroll, insisting that every single paycheck must be accurate, which led to additional risk assessments and planning.

Solution

The change team recognized that both perspectives were valid and worked to balance their approaches:

For the CFO’s concerns, they gathered data to show how many employees were truly impacted and adjusted the messaging to emphasize financial accountability.
For the CPO’s concerns, they prioritized payroll readiness, ensuring robust contingency plans were in place before go-live.
The project team proactively communicated the different leadership priorities so teams understood why certain decisions were being made.

Result

The ERP rollout incorporated checks and balances that addressed both financial control and employee well-being.
By validating both perspectives and proactively adjusting the plan, the change team prevented unnecessary conflict and last-minute roadblocks.
The leadership team became more aligned, recognizing the value of different personas in decision-making.

Key Takeaways

Different leadership personas have different priorities. Understanding Guardian vs. Harmonizer mindsets helps anticipate and navigate conflicts.
Data can bridge leadership conflicts. Providing hard numbers helped balance financial control with operational feasibility.
Both risk mitigation and human impact matter. The best change plans integrate financial discipline with employee experience.

yearly Transit Reading

— OUR CORE BELIEF —

Change doesn’t have to be overwhelming.
It doesn’t have to create resistance, burnout or fear.
Done right—with creativity, science, and care—
change can be an opportunity.
A story worth telling.
A transformation that lasts.